Visual differences between people go much further than just their physical features. There are a million cases where you can make a reasonable assumption that someone isn't very smart by looking at them. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Or even better, post a top-level comment stating the question you wish OP had asked, and then explain both sides of that question! (And if you think OP broke the rule for quesitons, report it!) Top-level responses must make a sincere effort to present at least the most common two perceptions of the issue or controversy in good faith, with sympathy to the respective side.Īny requests for clarification of the original question, other "observations" that are not explaining both sides, or similar comments should be made in response to this post or some other top-level post. This sub's rule for-top level comments is only this: 1. Respond to THIS comment instead of posting your own top-level comment Hey there! Do you want clarification about the question? Think there's a better way to phrase it? Wish OP had asked a different question? Questions, even those that otherwise abide by the rules, that seem especially likely to lead to incivility may be removed for that reason. Posts and threads that contain excessive incivility of any sort may be removed by the moderators. Note: If you make a top-level response that includes a phrase such as "there is only one side to this" not only will your comment be removed, but you may receive a time-out from comment privileges in the subreddit. You do not have to personally believe either of the sides you are explaining, instead you must explain on what supposed basis each side's adherents sincerely believe their own side. Since the purpose of ExplainBothSides is to create opportunities for responders to explore, especially, the side they disagree with, responses that do not make this attempt, however informative they may be, are subject to removal. Top-level responses must make a sincere effort to present at least the most common two perceptions of the issue or controversy in good faith, with sympathy to the respective side.Posts phrased in this way are usually better suited to r/changemyview. Note: Your post may be removed if you specifically ask for only "the other side" of a controversy after stating your own view. Since the purpose of ExplainBothSides is to create opportunities for explainers, questions are subject to removal if they do not clearly present such an opportunity (for example, by asking for only one side to be explained or by not clearly identifying an established controversy). Questions must state a specific topic about which there is disagreement, and strive to present that question in a neutral manner (e.g.Try it! Try your best to present both (or multiple) sides in explaining one of these issues. But the greatest benefit of ExplainBothSides is usually to the explainer - who has a chance to develop the habit of mind of understanding the perspectives of those with whom the explainer disagrees.
Often (perhaps even typically) the result of explaining both sides is informative to readers trying to understand an issue for the first time. The purpose of ExplainBothSides is to create opportunities to present both sides of a controversial issue.
“ Nothing is easier than to denounce the evildoer nothing is more difficult than to understand him.”
0 kommentar(er)
